'Critical Analysis of “23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism”\r'

' vital ANALYSIS OF HA-JOON CHANG’S â€Å"23 THINGS THEY DON’T TELL YOU ABOUT CAPITALISM” Depending on whizz’s definition of globalization (whether it be the transnational trade liberalization that facilitates technological production and sparing consolidation across borders, or accessible integration that exemplifies our interconnectedness and focuses on the speed of information, shrinking clock and space, and the relations that we have built beyond somatogenic location. Theoretical scenes are said to be informative frameworks that help us in understanding macrocosm and determine what is important (O’ Brien and Williams, 16).Often, prestigious academics identify with a particular perspective. However drawing upon more than 1 perspective is not uncommon. Such is the case with Ha-Joon Chang in his book 23 Things They Don’t give notice (of) You About Capitalism. Chang seems to draw upon several perspectives, two of which head for t he hills as most predominant: â€Å"economic patriot perspective” (which carries the heaviest weight in Chang’s apprehension) and the â€Å" captious perspective” (which underlines his overarching theories of capitalism and the secernate). First, this essay will state that Ha-Joon Chang can fall within the ‘economic superpatriotic’ theoretical perspectives.However, perceivable cracks in his logic would forgo one to believe that he may alike be attune to a ‘critical’ perspective, visual perception as he often touches on social and class inequalities created by liberalized economies. A critique of his perspective in identifying where he deviates from the economic nationalist thought and portrays a more critical one, becoming specifiable with historical materialist Robert Cox. Significant cleavages are identified plainly Chang fails to recognize a key pillar in the critical perspective that is, the role of women in capitalism and g lobalization.\r\n'