Comparison Of Marcus Garvey And David Duke Essay example -- essays res

Racial issues have always been debated and followed by some people throughout the history of America and will continue to be for a coarse time. Along with these debates come movements and with movements come leaders. Two well-k nown leaders of raciall(a)y driven movements are Marcus Garvey and David Duke. Garvey was a black creation looking to in front his fellow black man&8217s financial state and breathing conditions, and he became a leader for his movement. Duke is a white man who feels that with all of the racial diversity in this country the white race is universe mistreated and destroyed, and became a leader for a more extreme grouping of believers. These two extraordinary men can be compared and contrasted with respect to their groups, views, and faults.First, some(prenominal) of these men were cognise for their participation in racial interest groups. Marcus Garvey founded the coupled Negro Improvement tie-up (UNIA). The objectives of the UNIA were to promote raci al pride, create colleges and universiteies for blacks, and ground world-wide commercial ventures. (Rogoff 67). Garvey founded the UNIA because during his frequent ravels he observed that black people were universe mistreated, especially when it came to work. He observed the inferior status of black workers somewhat the world. In an attempt to help relieve the plight of these workers he founded the UNIA. The UNIA was, in fact, the first, dominant black interest group, even before the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). In just a a couple of(prenominal) years after it was founded in 1914, the UNIA had four million members in 1920 and 6 million in 1923. David Duke&8217s famous interest group was the disreputable Ku Klux Klan. Duke became a member of the KKK when he was only a teenager. He quickly became the Imperial Wizard of the Klan, the highest ranking official. What Duke brought to the Klan was a new, charming, intellectual personality. He t reasured to change the stereotypical view of a rowdy, unintelligent redneck Klansman. at a lower place his leadership many new people joined the Klan thinking that it was now respectable with Duke at the Helm. While he is not still with the Klan now, he left an impression in that group that will never be forgotten. Both Garvey&8217s and Duke&8217s affiliation with interest groups helped draw precaution to not only the group but also t... ...itical experts thought he would be. The downfall for Duke&8217s political success was his notorious past. He had been associated with many ill-famed groups such as the national socialist Party and the Ku Klux Klan as a young man. In an event that would haunt his political career forever, he marched around in his Nazi uniform at LSU in a student protest. While now he regrets doing that and blaming it on his immaturity and youth, he will never live it down. His opponents use his Klan affiliation and Nazi Party affiliation against him in every el ection. Like Garvey, he had a fault that kept him from achieving his goal.Marcus Garvey and David Duke were both(prenominal) very extraordinary people with unusual ideas and contributions. While being totally different people and races they held many of the alike(p) viewpoints. Each man had his own way of expressing his ideas and each was well known for his stand. Each man envisioned a better world for both races. They saw peace and tranquillity within mankind, but each man had a different view of how it would get that way. These men&8217s goals, when looked at objectively are not all bad. They just wanted what they felt was best.