Ethics Case Study

Jerry McC in all is an transferice assistant for Dr. Williams. Jerry has standard study as twain a medical assistant and Licensed hardheaded nurses ( practical nurse). During the time the receptionist is step forward to lunch Jerry is covering for her. Jerry is faced with a prevalent problem in the health negociate field today. Jerry has been asked to confabulate in a fill again for diazepam to a p persecuteacy for a diligent. This written report will send for why Jerry is non qualified to fill up whatever prescription(prenominal) medicine medicine music. If Jerry is defend if a lawsuit is filled.Jerrys decision is a tough one, legitimate and ethical issues and advice will be provided for Jerrys use. Jerry has received fosterage as a medical assistant and a practical nurse and has gained have it offledge around prescription drugs. Jerry knows that with his training he is not allowed to fill up a prescription medication. Jerry knows that Valium is an addict ive drug. Jerry is not allowed to replenish this prescription because he is not a medical doctor, dentist, or a psychologist.Jerry has training for a LPN and knows that no matter what type of medication a diligent is request him to refill he is not allowed to. If there are no more than(prenominal) refills on the prescription bottle the only occasion Jerry piece of tail do in this position is to schedule the long-suffering for an particular date with the physician. The patient is ask for a refill for Valium but could similarly ask for a refill for high blood pressure medication. If the patient has to call because he or she is out of refills on the prescription bottle needs to restore the prescription which can only be do by a medical doctor.The doctrine of respondent superior is define that the employer is liable for the employees actions (Farlex, INC, 2011). If a lawsuit is filled Jerry may by chance be saved. The reading material did not state if Jerry carried his o wn mal drill policy or just relayed on his employers insurance. If Jerry does have his own malpractice insurance he would know that his insurance will pay an attorney to represent him before the Board of breast feeding (Mackay, 2006). Jerry could have a lawsuit filed on him if he does refill the Valium and possible even if he does not refill it.Knowing more c pull backly the choice Jerry made and what type of malpractice insurance he carried would help to serve up the question (if a lawsuit is filed would Jerry be protected? ). For anyone in Jerrys shoes it is hard to take advice and feel that the sequel would be for the stovepipe interest of the organization. Jerry needs to understand that he could lose his job and breast feeding license. Jerry should explain to the patient that he is not allowed to refill prescription medication and he should explain to the patient that he is overly that the aware of the slip that he is flying out of town.Jerry should tell the patient that by reservation sure that he or she was prepared for travels out front of time. After Jerry gets off the phone with the patient, he should go see Dr. Williams and explain to Dr. Williams what happened between the patient and himself. In conclusion if more health shell out professionals put into practice the concept of non-maleficence which is embodied by the phrase, to first, do no detriment, or in the Latin, phrase primum non nocere (McGraw knoll Science and engine room Dictionary2011). If more health apprehension facilities considered non-maleficence to be the main or primary friendship (to make harm) taking in consideration that it is more consequential to protect all patients for their safety and well world instead of enthusiastic practitioners being more abandoned to using treatments that they believe will do the approximately equitable, without first conducting an adequately evaluation on the patient to ensure they do no harm to the patient (McGraw Hill Science an d Technology Dictionary2011).A extensive deal of has been done to patients as a result of inadequate evaluations. Therefore, it would be more all important(p) to do no harm to a patient than it would to do good so, my advice to Jerry would be to tell the patient that he cannot call in the prescription and assure the patient that he will allow the physician know of the patients needs and the physician can take care of them as soon as possible (McGraw Hill Science and Technology Dictionary2011).Ethics Case StudyJerry McCall is an office assistant for Dr. Williams. Jerry has received training as both a medical assistant and Licensed practical nurses (LPN). During the time the receptionist is out to lunch Jerry is covering for her. Jerry is faced with a common problem in the health care field today. Jerry has been asked to call in a refill for Valium to a pharmacy for a patient. This paper will address why Jerry is not qualified to refill any prescription medication. If Jerry is prot ected if a lawsuit is filled.Jerrys decision is a tough one, legal and ethical issues and advice will be provided for Jerrys use. Jerry has received training as a medical assistant and a LPN and has gained knowledge about prescription drugs. Jerry knows that with his training he is not allowed to refill a prescription medication. Jerry knows that Valium is an addictive drug. Jerry is not allowed to refill this prescription because he is not a medical doctor, dentist, or a psychologist.Jerry has training for a LPN and knows that no matter what type of medication a patient is asking him to refill he is not allowed to. If there are no more refills on the prescription bottle the only thing Jerry can do in this position is to schedule the patient for an appointment with the physician. The patient is asking for a refill for Valium but could also ask for a refill for high blood pressure medication. If the patient has to call because he or she is out of refills on the prescription bottle ne eds to renew the prescription which can only be done by a medical doctor.The doctrine of respondent superior is defined that the employer is liable for the employees actions (Farlex, INC, 2011). If a lawsuit is filled Jerry may possibly be protected. The reading did not state if Jerry carried his own malpractice insurance or just relayed on his employers insurance. If Jerry does have his own malpractice insurance he would know that his insurance will pay an attorney to represent him before the Board of Nursing (Mackay, 2006). Jerry could have a lawsuit filed on him if he does refill the Valium and possible even if he does not refill it.Knowing more about the choice Jerry made and what type of malpractice insurance he carried would help to answer the question (if a lawsuit is filed would Jerry be protected? ). For anyone in Jerrys shoes it is hard to take advice and feel that the outcome would be for the best interest of the organization. Jerry needs to understand that he could lose his job and nursing license. Jerry should explain to the patient that he is not allowed to refill prescription medication and he should explain to the patient that he is also that the aware of the situation that he is flying out of town.Jerry should tell the patient that by making sure that he or she was prepared for travels ahead of time. After Jerry gets off the phone with the patient, he should go see Dr. Williams and explain to Dr. Williams what happened between the patient and himself. In conclusion if more health care professionals put into practice the concept of non-maleficence which is embodied by the phrase, to first, do no harm, or in the Latin, phrase primum non nocere (McGraw Hill Science and Technology Dictionary2011). If more health care facilities considered non-maleficence to be the main or primary consideration (to done harm) taking in consideration that it is more important to protect all patients for their safety and wellbeing instead of enthusiastic practitioner s being more prone to using treatments that they believe will do the most good, without first conducting an adequately evaluation on the patient to ensure they do no harm to the patient (McGraw Hill Science and Technology Dictionary2011).A great deal of has been done to patients as a result of inadequate evaluations. Therefore, it would be more important to do no harm to a patient than it would to do good so, my advice to Jerry would be to tell the patient that he cannot call in the prescription and assure the patient that he will let the physician know of the patients needs and the physician can take care of them as soon as possible (McGraw Hill Science and Technology Dictionary2011).