The Myer-Briggs Type Indicator

The Myer-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is the most widely utilise face-to-faceity sagaciousness instrument in the world. More than two million people ended it annually in the world (Robbins & Barnwell, 2008). The reliability of the MBTI instrument for management is support by over fifty years of research and use, proving to be a reliable tool for management and human resource development, both personalised and cargoner counselling, and even for team-building and improving communication.Comprising 100 personality tests, it assesses how people typify and feel in various situations (Michael & William, 2009). MBTI test pull up stakess present an item-by-items personality electences thus helping individuals better understand themselves and assisting them in fashioning cargoner choices. Possible applications for the MBTI include communication, conflict resolution, personal growth and development, finding making and problem solving (Thompson, 2010, p19).Also the MBTI helps manageme nt to encourage sort outs of individuals to withdraw about themselves, each other, and better organize convocation resources to achieve group goals. On the basis of the answers individuals confine to the test, the MBTI classifies individuals into sixteen unique personality base on 4 dimensions (Robins, 2009). They atomic number 18 Extroverted or Introverted (E or I), Sensing or Intuitive (S or N), Thinking or public opinion (T or F), and Judging or Perceiving (J or P). Extroverted-Introverted method of functioning.Extroverted individuals ar outgoing, sociable and assertive, they tend to act, then reflect, and then act again to come across selective information and reflect on it before arriving at a decision. Introverts are quiet and shy, opt to reflect, then act, then reflect again to address possible alternatives before arriving at a decision (Michael & William, 2009) Sensing-Intuitive how individuals take in information. Individuals who are sensing are more likely focus on detail and what is actually present, are practical and opt routine and order. They invariably trust their xperience and focus on what is real here and now. By contrast, individuals who prefer scholarship rely on unconscious processes and tend to trust information that is more abstract or theoretical, to focus more on implications and inferences, to view at the big picture to gather information (Robins, 2009). Thinking-Feeling how individuals make decision. Those who prefer thinking are more logical, causal, and more consistent in their perspective. They footprint decision by what seems reasonable and tend to use an analytical off motion to problem solving.Conversely, those who prefer feeling tend to introduce their own value and emotions into the decision making process. However, where situations differ, their value and emotion provoke be variable. Therefore, their decision-making is establish on the situation and their emotional involvement in that situation (Moh ammad, 2009). Judgment-perceiving individuals lifestyle. Judgment types desire control and prefer their worlds to be orderly, intend and scheduled everything in its place. By contrast, those who are perception orientated prefer an open, flexible, and unstructured lifestyle (Michael & William, 2009).According to the research by McCare and John (2002) inexpugnable relation exists between individual personality and performance in teams. The four dimensions can classify individuals into sixteen personality type. ESTJs are the organisers in the team. They are realistic, practical and prefer order, like use reason and logic to do problems. They energize a natural head for business or group dynamics. Consequently, they like to organise and run activities (Carlopio & Andrewartha, 2008). INTJs are the monitors and the evaluators in the team.They usually have original minds and strongly focus on their own ideas and purposes. Additionally, they are critical, independent, rigid and often stubborn. The ENTPs are conceptualisers. They are individualistic, versatile and focus on innovation. They are innovative in solving challenging problems, but may dismiss routine assignments. According to the research, 13 business people who create super-successful firms such(prenominal) as Microsoft, Apple Computer, Sony, FedEX and Honda Motors found that all 13 were transcendental thinkers (Robins, 2009).This result is especially interesting because MBTI suggests only 5% of the population are intuitive thinkers. In addition, while more and more people are exploitation MBTI in Australia today, simultaneously the number of users is starting to rise in rough Asian countries as well (Henry, 2010). The MBTI is mainly used in organisations including banks, hospitals, IT firms, universities, taking into custody service, finance companies, MNC and even the Australian Defence Forces (Robins, 2009).The results from these organisations reveal that, in general, HR carriages and educate d managers tend to have higher intuition scores. On the contrary, manager in high regulated organisations such as the police, armed forces and fiscal management tend to have lower scores in intuition (Mohammad, 2009). Example At the beginning of my university life, I experienced course plectron mistake. I chose accounting for my major simply because I thought I was good at mathematic. Unfortunately, I didnt understand my personality very well. by and by one semester, I realised accounting was not an appropriate root for me. Im not a conscientious person, I unceasingly leave my belongings around, often forget to put things back in their proper place and make a mess of everything, often existence not well prepared before class. Further, I dont pay help to details and frequently neglect routine assignments. Consequently, the formal demands of accounting are not suitable for me. However, having finished the MBTI test, I found Im an ENTP type person, which openness to experience per son.Im ever so affirmative about life and even in a difficult environment, I regard bracing things as challenges and widening my experience, which means I dont give up readily. I dont perceive such things as failures and losses and am not upset by such events. Secondly, Im an originative person. I have diverse interests. I like trying and exploring new things and challenging new environments, so I always look forward to discovering new things. Thirdly, I have excellent ideas, spend time reflecting on things, and constantly try to search for ways to change my previous ideas (MBTI test).Consequently, I changed my major to Economics, a subject better suited to my personality. Recommendation some(prenominal) managers and employees need to understand the benefits of using the MBTI (Michael & William, 2009). From the managers point of view, MBTI can improve management skills enhance inter-organisation communication and developmental efforts. From the employees viewpoint, an reason o f individuals personalities can help organisations reduce group conflict, improve work relations and team development, further achieve a affirmatory work environment, and increase work-group performance and productivity (John, 2008).In addition, the more MBTI is appropriately used in an organisation, the more the management would see its value (Roselle, 2009). When the MBTI is used frequently in conjunction with other management skills, it helps individuals to gather the perceptivity they need for personal growth and development, to achieve decision making and steady down problem skills, and to help groups better understand themselves and each other in a team environment and different situation (Peter & Garry, 2004).Finally, having gained the feedback from using the MBTI instrument, a careful analysis of the information helps in arriving at fresh polity decision. Belbin (2006) found that groups with mixed social occasions can be more productive than other groups. It means dif ferent personal and master copy roles have their own property this can bring many benefits if a group contains a salmagundi of personality types, each type filling a particular role in the dynamics of the group.For instance, having completed the MBTI test, I understood myself very well, my personal characteristic, my strengths and my weaknesses. Consequently, a design group manager has invited me to join his group on the basis of my personal strengths, thus complementing the strengths of the group, all of us having previously through the MBTI test. I found we all have different group professional roles, Member A is always focused on the task, is highly motivated to achieve goals and influences group members to achieve goals more smoothly.Member B is a good listener and supporter, friendly to everyone, helps group member to resolve deadly conflicts, and facilitate group cooperation. Member C is an enthusiastic person who always encourages group members to explore new ideas and p roblem solving skills. As we prate in a comfortable environment, our group relationship has improved, leading us to communicate more with other group members. Thus our work-group performance and productivity have increased.